Eigra

Wavefunctions

The wavefunction ψ(x)\psi(x) is often the single most important quantity in quantum mechanics. It carries all the information about the state of a particle, and its squared modulus ∣ψ(x)∣2|\psi(x)|^2 is the probability density of finding the particle at position xx. How is it properly defined?

Decomposing in the eigenbasis of an arbitrary operator

Take any operator A^\hat A and diagonalise it: this gives an eigenbasis ∣ψn⟩| \psi_n \rangle with eigenvalues ana_n. The state of the particle can be written as a superposition of these eigenstates:

∣ψ⟩=∑ncn∣ψn⟩, | \psi \rangle = \sum_n c_n | \psi_n \rangle,

where the coefficients cnc_n are given by the inner product cn=⟨ψn∣ψ⟩c_n = \langle \psi_n | \psi \rangle. This decomposition is particularly well suited to reading off the probability of measuring the value ana_n of the observable A^\hat A: it is simply ∣cn∣2|c_n|^2 (in the non-degenerate case).

The position operator

The idea, then, is to build an operator that measures the position of a state and to decompose the state of the particle in its eigenbasis, following exactly the recipe above. One cannot, however, take A^=x^\hat A = \hat x directly: as we'll see, its eigenstates are not normalisable, and so are not physical states in the usual sense. The problem is regularised by cutting space into small intervals of size Δ\Delta. Order the intervals and label them In(Δ)I_n(\Delta). Define the position operator x^Δ\hat{x}^\Delta as follows: it acts on a state ψ\psi by projecting the wavefunction onto the interval In(Δ)I_n(\Delta) and multiplying by the position xnx_n. Its eigenstates are denoted ∣In(Δ)⟩| I_n(\Delta) \rangle, and

x^Δ∣In(Δ)⟩=xn∣In(Δ)⟩.\hat{x}^\Delta | I_n(\Delta) \rangle = x_n | I_n(\Delta) \rangle.

For these eigenstates to be physical, they are taken to have unit norm: ∣In(Δ)⟩| I_n(\Delta) \rangle represents the particle spread uniformly over the interval, with associated function 1/Δ1/\sqrt{\Delta} on In(Δ)I_n(\Delta) and 00 elsewhere — the factor 1/Δ1/\sqrt{\Delta} is exactly what's needed for ∫In(Δ)1Δ dx=1\int_{I_n(\Delta)} \frac{1}{\Delta} \, dx = 1.

The state ∣ψ⟩| \psi \rangle can then be decomposed in this eigenbasis:

∣ψ⟩=∑ncn(Δ)∣In(Δ)⟩,| \psi \rangle = \sum_n c_n(\Delta) | I_n(\Delta) \rangle,

where the coefficients cn(Δ)c_n(\Delta) — written with a Δ\Delta to distinguish them from the generic cnc_n of the previous paragraph, of which they are just the particular case for the operator x^Δ\hat x^\Delta — are cn(Δ)=⟨In(Δ)∣ψ⟩c_n(\Delta) = \langle I_n(\Delta) | \psi \rangle. Writing this inner product as an integral,

cn(Δ)=1Δ∫In(Δ)ψ(x) dx,c_n(\Delta) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\Delta}} \int_{I_n(\Delta)} \psi(x) \, dx,

shows that dividing once more by Δ\sqrt{\Delta} amounts to taking the average of ψ\psi over the interval. It only remains to let Δ\Delta tend to zero. By Riemann sums, this limit is well defined and gives the wavefunction ψ(x)\psi(x):

ψ(x)=lim⁡Δ→0cn(Δ)Δfor x∈In(Δ).\psi(x) = \lim_{\Delta \to 0} \frac{c_n(\Delta)}{\sqrt{\Delta}} \quad \text{for } x \in I_n(\Delta).
2
= 3.200
Space cut into intervals , refined finer and finer. Each bar is the average of over its interval, i.e. — as the histogram merges into the curve. Notice can be negative: only is a probability density.

More simply, denote the limit of the states as Δ→0\Delta \to 0 by ∣x⟩=lim⁡Δ→0∣In(Δ)⟩| x \rangle = \lim_{\Delta \to 0} | I_n(\Delta) \rangle, giving

ψ(x)=⟨x∣ψ⟩.\psi(x) = \langle x | \psi \rangle.

The state decomposes as an integral over the eigenstates of the position operator:

∣ψ⟩=∫dx ψ(x)∣x⟩.| \psi \rangle = \int dx \, \psi(x) | x \rangle.

Momentum

The same procedure can be applied to momentum. Instead of the position operator, consider the momentum p^\hat p of a state. The resulting basis is denoted ∣p⟩| p \rangle. The state ∣ψ⟩| \psi \rangle can be decomposed in this basis:

∣ψ⟩=∫dp ψ~(p)∣p⟩,| \psi \rangle = \int dp \, \tilde{\psi}(p) | p \rangle,

where ψ~(p)=⟨p∣ψ⟩\tilde{\psi}(p) = \langle p | \psi \rangle is the wavefunction in momentum space.

The states ∣p⟩| p \rangle must likewise be decomposable in the eigenbasis of the position operator, so

∣p⟩=∫dx ⟨x∣p⟩∣x⟩.| p \rangle = \int dx \, \langle x | p \rangle | x \rangle.

These states are, in the position basis,

⟨x∣p⟩=12πℏ eipx/ℏ,\langle x | p \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}} \, e^{ipx/\hbar},

plane waves, normalised in the distributional sense: ⟨p∣p′⟩=δ(p−p′)\langle p | p' \rangle = \delta(p - p'). Inserting a decomposition on the position basis, ψ~(p)\tilde\psi(p) becomes

ψ~(p)=⟨p∣ψ⟩=∫dx ⟨p∣x⟩⟨x∣ψ⟩=12πℏ∫dx e−ipx/ℏ ψ(x):\tilde\psi(p) = \langle p | \psi \rangle = \int dx \, \langle p | x \rangle \langle x | \psi \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}} \int dx \, e^{-ipx/\hbar} \, \psi(x):

the momentum-space wavefunction is the Fourier transform of the position-space wavefunction.

The wavefunction of any operator

In fact, there is no reason to stop at position and momentum. For any operator A^\hat A with a continuous spectrum, one can define a wavefunction ψA(a)=⟨a∣ψ⟩\psi_A(a) = \langle a | \psi \rangle as the coefficients of the state ∣ψ⟩| \psi \rangle in the eigenbasis ∣a⟩| a \rangle of A^\hat A. The wavefunction is thus a general concept, one that depends on the operator chosen.